If you tuned into the Oscars pre-show on Sunday, you probably noticed the red carpet was absolutely giving. Giving glam. Giving drama. Giving… well, giving giving — over and over again.
It seems like every host, influencer, and fashion correspondent latched onto the word like it was the latest designer clutch. “She’s giving Old Hollywood.” “This look is giving ethereal goddess.” “He’s giving main character energy.” By the end of the night, it felt like the only thing not being given was a break from the word itself.
Language evolves, and cultural catchphrases are nothing new. From “on fleek” to “slay,” social media’s influence on how we talk is undeniable. But the saturation of “giving” at the Oscars pre-show highlighted how quickly a fun, expressive term can turn into a verbal crutch. What started as a playful way to describe vibes and aesthetics became a repetitive loop that dulled the sparkle of the red carpet commentary.
When every outfit is “giving,” the word loses its punch. Zendaya’s effortlessly chic ensemble? Giving. Timothée Chalamet’s bold fashion choice? Giving. Even someone simply standing there, breathing in their tux? Apparently giving. The overuse flattened the nuance of what makes these looks, and the artists wearing them, truly stand out.
Of course, language is meant to be fluid and fun, and pop culture thrives on shared phrases. But maybe next award season, we can expand the vocabulary a bit. Let’s serve some variety. Let’s deliver fresh descriptions. Let’s offer words that reflect the true range of creativity and artistry that the Oscars represent.
Because when words are overused, they stop giving anything at all. And these stars — with their stunning fashion, their bold choices, their moments of pure elegance — deserve so much more than a recycled catchphrase.
What do you think? Is it time to retire “giving” from red carpet lingo, or do you still love the vibe? Let me know in the comments!